A forum to discuss fan and media studies.
I will be posting interesting links, gathering data for my thesis, and sharing my thoughts and papers on anything and everything that strikes my fancy.
Please feel free to comment, argue, question, or email me at fanthropology(at)gmail(dot)com.
Sunday, July 29, 2007
dark knight's viral marketing continued
once again, and always, covered by our good friends at AICN. taking full advantage of the nerd pilgrimage to comic-con, the deliciously secretive marketing campaign continues.
the appearance of cool nerds
perhaps it is only a wishful thinking on my part, but why does it seem as though, all of a sudden, the geeks, the nerds, and even the dorks have recently managed to become an accepted and even beloved part of mainstream culture?
when did words like "con" and "cosplay" enter the everyday vocabulary? the most popular shows on television now practically require one to become a fan - following the content online, debating cast changes, buying all the associated products...
who is to blame for this transformation in the general consciousness? is it the dvds and their special features? the ability to easily watch and re-watch cult shows from decades past? hear actor's commentary?
or was it the internet, the readily available information on every minute detail of the ppre- and post-production of media, follow the blogs, interact with the creators, influence popular opinion through forum posts?
i really think we have reached a new age of media, where everything is connected, crosses over, and there are no boundaries between genres or formats any longer. some may call this postmoderism, but i hate labels like that.
as i write this, i am pondering gaiman's storytelling while watching koop's rahxephon amv euphoria.
when did words like "con" and "cosplay" enter the everyday vocabulary? the most popular shows on television now practically require one to become a fan - following the content online, debating cast changes, buying all the associated products...
who is to blame for this transformation in the general consciousness? is it the dvds and their special features? the ability to easily watch and re-watch cult shows from decades past? hear actor's commentary?
or was it the internet, the readily available information on every minute detail of the ppre- and post-production of media, follow the blogs, interact with the creators, influence popular opinion through forum posts?
i really think we have reached a new age of media, where everything is connected, crosses over, and there are no boundaries between genres or formats any longer. some may call this postmoderism, but i hate labels like that.
as i write this, i am pondering gaiman's storytelling while watching koop's rahxephon amv euphoria.
Wednesday, July 25, 2007
Presidential YouTube Debate
Official Youtube site
- Youtube as sponsor of debate
- hailed as new age of "participatory democracy", "new media"
- See Daily Show coverage, Jul. 24/07
- importance of involving youth by appealing to new technologies, but debate itself filled with same ol'
- Youtube as sponsor of debate
- hailed as new age of "participatory democracy", "new media"
- See Daily Show coverage, Jul. 24/07
- importance of involving youth by appealing to new technologies, but debate itself filled with same ol'
Tuesday, July 24, 2007
Fan writers going pro
or at least being recruited to do the studio's dirty work, so says AICN re: the proposed reboot movie.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)